Jump to content

shirsig

Player
  • Content count

    288
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by shirsig

  1. shirsig

    [AddOn] aux and more

    Well, for the automatic undercutting sort of, but you still lose the ability to manually specify an exact stack price. What you also lose though, is transparency, because then you get several entries in the listing with the same price and it's not clear why they're not collapsed, why they're sorted the way they are or why you get different results when undercutting. If there were any huge drawbacks I would change it in a heartbeat but I fail to see what's so horrible about the extra precision.
  2. shirsig

    [AddOn] aux and more

    At lower levels it can be significant. At higher levels it's not much, true, but it's still a pretty much guaranteed loss. Not a big deal, but neither is showing the .000 which you're acting like it's the next shoah.
  3. shirsig

    [AddOn] aux and more

    Huh? Look, let's say you wanna post a stack of linen cloth and want to undercut some other auction by 1c, what unit price would you use? 1c less? Then you're actually undercutting by 20c, not by 1c. You need to post it at 1/20c less to undercut by 1c, but how do you do that if you cannot specify numbers smaller than 1? Most AH addons actually do not allow undercutting by 1c. Some undercut the unit price by 1c (bad) and some undercut in different ways, like by 5% (also bad).
  4. shirsig

    [AddOn] aux and more

    Respect is not earned by insults and demands, nor does respecting users mean to cater to their every whim.
  5. shirsig

    [AddOn] aux and more

    As I explained before, fractionals are needed so that you can specify an exact stack price by unit price, particularly for undercutting by 1c. The reason for the .000 is purely for alignment and consistency so that the prices are easier to compare. In the images you posted the alignment was messed up anyway because of your custom font but, well, nothing I can do there. After the latest change to the post tab, don't pretty much all your complaints come down to features you don't want to use that you can easily ignore (though you want me to remove them)? I don't consider those huge problems exactly.
  6. shirsig

    [AddOn] aux and more

    Yeah, sorry, lol, it doesn't work that way as I happen to not be your servant. I think your argument against the usefulness of the listing is pretty weak but I'll keep it in mind.
  7. shirsig

    [AddOn] aux and more

    Unfortunately you then also have to move tons of other items to fill the gap or make space. Seems crazy to do this every time you switch between 2h/1h, even with a bag sort addon. I see the point of keeping your inventory tidy to some degree but doing it so obsessively seems like a waste of time. And even if it's perfectly tidy the post listing is still a bit clearer/more concise.
  8. shirsig

    [AddOn] aux and more

    When you unequip gear it automatically gets placed at the top if the slots don't match (1h/shield vs 2h), same when transferring between inventory and bank. Quest items come and go, reagents, consumables also get moved around when you use/restock them, also not a solution to many stacks of the same item.
  9. shirsig

    [AddOn] aux and more

    Yes, it is irrational to search for your auctionable items within your mounts, pets, reagents, crafting tools, resistance gear, multiple stacks of the same item etc. when this listing hides all those. You disagree? Try a rational argument rather than insults. You deserve to be happy but if you think I am responsible for your happiness you need to get a grip on reality.
  10. shirsig

    [AddOn] aux and more

    Sorry but you're the one acting like an entitled child. It's not difficult at all to make options. My goal is to make aux effective, not to make irrational people happy. If you know how to make it more effective present your argument and if effectiveness doesn't make you happy, too bad.
  11. shirsig

    [AddOn] aux and more

    It's a problem with the used mode. Not sure how to fix it but you can always deactivate it (/cooldowns used).
  12. shirsig

    [AddOn] aux and more

    Those are not preferences, I'm making objective arguments as to why things are the way they are. If you can't provide a better argument you won't see a change. Obviously I will not go to lengths to implement settings for ridiculously picky requests like hiding a table column you don't use (for irrational reasons even). Excessive customization is nothing but an excuse for lazy design.
  13. shirsig

    [AddOn] aux and more

    The listing isn't the same as the inventory at all. It shows only one entry per item, sorts alphabetically, doesn't show items which aren't auctionable, shows the names to distinguish items with the same icon without having to hover over them and lets you hide further items you never want to auction for some reason. In your image it doesn't make that big a difference but if you have mounts, reagents, crafting tools, consumables, quest items etc. it makes things a lot easier. You don't have to multiply your prices by anything. What does it even matter what the stack price is? The items sell for what they sell either way. A list of items you're after? ... like, eh, the favorites in the search tab?
  14. shirsig

    [AddOn] aux and more

    https://github.com/shirsig/aux-addon/issues/78
  15. shirsig

    [AddOn] aux and more

    It still exists, you can get it with /aux post bid I've now made some more changes to it, namely it lists no longer the auction's real unit price but the unit price it would have with your selected stack size, which is more useful for undercutting the stack size. 1. I don't see the point, it's never a good idea to blindly accept so you're not really saving time even if the lowest would be a good one to undercut. 2. I'm thinking about it, but it would create some complications. Only using the unit price has the advantage that you don't have to deal with the problem of what to do with the price when the stack size changes. 3. Then you can't decide the exact price of your auctions anymore? Doesn't seem very elegant even if it may not make a huge difference.
  16. shirsig

    [AddOn] aux and more

    Any thoughts on the new post interface? The buyout only version in the image is my attempt to make as simple an interface as possible for posting under the assumption that no one or at least few are using the default AH. The reason I brought back the selection for undercutting rather than just doing it on clicks is because when the stack size changes the ideal undercut may change where I would define the ideal undercut as "the highest possible stack price so that the unit price is lower than the one of the auction you're trying to undercut". Of course when the stack size is the same that's always simply 1 copper less (1/stack size copper less for the unit price). This way you don't have to click again to adjust the undercut when the stack size changes, for example to post the remainder after posting a stack size that doesn't divide your item count. I've removed the saving of stack size because it seemed the cons outweighed the pros. Especially having the stack size automatically be the highest possible which many requested would not have been possible. Usually I would say it is best to choose the stack size to match the auction that you're undercutting (shortcut double click) because that makes it most obvious to the buyer that yours is cheaper so there's not much of a reason to save the stack size as the ideal one changes depending on the current auctions. Having the stack size maxed out automatically also makes it more convenient to post the remainder. Once I had an option to do it automatically which I had to remove when I removed the selection but I think one extra click for this is fine as it's probably best to undercut a different auction anyway because the stack size is different. I'm not sure yet what exactly the optional bid listing should show. Right now it still has the same columns as the buyout listing, but is sorted by stack price and the undercut is also for the stack price, which is a bit weird. I don't think undercutting bid unit prices makes much sense so I hope no one will miss that.
  17. shirsig

    [AddOn] aux and more

    thanks, fixed
  18. shirsig

    [AddOn] aux and more

    The bid price undercutting is optional in the newest version (but if most of your potential buyers aren't using aux then it's definitely worth it). And yes, any search will contribute to the history, not just searches without filter either.
  19. shirsig

    [AddOn] aux and more

    That's a feature of aux, not crafty. With the newest version that's pretty easy, just have to click post a second time.
  20. shirsig

    [AddOn] aux and more

    /aux tooltip vendor sell
  21. shirsig

    [AddOn] aux and more

    made some changes to the post tab after many requests: stack size is no longer saved for an item, instead automatically set to the highest possible undercutting the stack price is gone and instead the table has a selection again and undercutting is automatically adjusted when the stack size changes (you can still match the stack size by double clicking) by default only buyout prices are listed, to get both listings use /aux post bid and /run ReloadUI() (there may be some bugs if you don't delete the savedvariables) edit: simplified coloring, only red for undercutting unit price in the buyout listing or undercutting stack price in the bid listing. Bid undercutting always undercuts the stack price.
  22. shirsig

    [AddOn] aux and more

    You need aux itself too. Then the folder is aux_merchant_prices and installed as if a separate addon. Sorry, not much spare time right now. Playing on nost pve and zeth (mostly twinking).
  23. Why doesn't it work for that?
  24. well, I added the skull thing and also changed the scanning to make it a bit less aggressive/work better with 3d portrait unit frames
  25. Why? You get the warning anyway, and the skull tells you to kill him.
×