Elvensept
Player-
Content count
39 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Elvensept
-
DoTimer or PowerAuras. First one is realy simple in stock.
-
Patch 1.5.0 (2005-06-07): Alterac Valley and Warsong Gulch added. OK, also let's close WSG on Elysium\ZK and "wait for that to happen".
-
Hello, thanks for working to improve the quality of the server. I had a question: all fishing pools have been deleted in the world? When can we expect them to return?
-
You need to increase the available memory for your addons.
-
Всё отлично, после того как группа в пять игроков убила моба, в ожидании остался всего один человек. Спасибо!
-
Обещаю дать фидбек вечером, если кто-нибудь не сделает это раньше. Забыл включить домашнюю тачку перед уходом из дома, доступа к клиенту нет.
-
Большое спасибо за то, что вы делаете. Будем ждать фикса.
-
Нет, не помогло, всё также толпа из нескольких групп стоит в ожидании респавна, в чате маты. Скрин, только что.
-
Poll: would you join a Burning Crusade pve server here?
Elvensept replied to Trukk's topic in General Discussion & Suggestions
No. I spent a lot of time in Outland, I'm here just for the classic content. I miss my dear netherdrake and indeed TBA is a great add-on, but it is not better than the original game. -
Mobhealth \ Mobinfo Хотя с этими аддонами тоже есть неоднозначные моменты, но количественные значения они всё же выводят (хотя и нестабильно). Есть подозрение, что это сервер так настроен, что вызывает подобные проблемы с цифрами на юнитфреймах.
-
group with Ratstick at your own risk [horde]
Elvensept replied to nerdz's topic in General Discussion & Suggestions
In your example, the warrior is forced to have to go up for auction only because the appropriate item to him was taken away by someone for his own monetary gain. I can not understand why, instead of to give the desired warrior sword we allow another player to capitalize on this. It's not correct and the warrior in your example still has more rights to the sword, I do not think money matters in correct roll question. I confidently believe the contents wowwiki result of collective activities of the wow-community, rather than one person. You can make changes there by yourself, оf course if you do allow a team of moderators, what I strongly doubt, because your opinion is contrary to accepted community rules of good manners. No, all the same you're just a greedy, greedy for money, it lurks in your every message in the subject line. I promise you and all who read this topic to actively fight against such a ninja in the game, and creating similar topics in the forum. If you do not understand that this is a manifestation of extreme disrespect to the other players - the community is forced to deal with the likes of ninja. Let's stop this dispute, your loot regarding policy compels me to add you to the black list, along with the other thieves. I call for this all the others, who do not want to risk their proprietary loot. -
Если я правильно понял ответ администрации - запрещено нахождение вне городов при использовании игрового клиента, запущенного с помощью multibox-систем. В таком случае неважно как расположены ваши персонажи, если один из них покинул пределы города - это нарушение. Т.е. необязательно оба (три,четыре,...) персонажа должны быть вне города, чтобы схлопотать бан.
-
group with Ratstick at your own risk [horde]
Elvensept replied to nerdz's topic in General Discussion & Suggestions
This subject have good description at Wowwiki: "Need: Mouse over the picture of the item to see its characteristics, and if you want to take it to use, click the pair-of-dice button to randomly generate a number from 1 to 100. This is a 'need' roll and the item should be an upgrade for you. If it is an upgrade for your offspec (e.g. healing plate for a tanking paladin), it's generally okay to click Need, but only if no one else needs the item for their main spec. Warning: If you 'need' every drop, you will likely be branded a ninja and have trouble finding groups. Greed: If you want it to sell, send to an alt, etc., click the coin button for a "greed" roll. This will only result in a roll if no one chooses need." +additionaly "Need before Greed: "Pass" is automatically selected for party members who cannot use the item. Not a particularly fair system, not nearly as good as it sounds at first glance. Just because you can equip an item does not mean you need it. Just because you can't equip an item does not mean that you do not have legitimate secondary claims on the item, for an alt or for disenchanting. This is the unalterable default for pickup groups created via the new Dungeon Finder interface introduced in Patch 3.3." - here you can see the position of Blizzard themselves and it does not coincide with your. +additionaly, but can't prove "For very valuable Bind on Equip items — which nearly any player can be expected to sell on the Auction House — Blizzard applied a loot-lock which if a player rolls "Need", it cannot be traded." I strongly disagree with the view that the value of BoE is the same for all, it is not. The value of an item is determined by how it fits on the armor type, class and stats. Someone's desire to capitalize on BoE should never be above the actual need to improve equipment for the main spec at a suitable player. Do not be so greedy. -
group with Ratstick at your own risk [horde]
Elvensept replied to nerdz's topic in General Discussion & Suggestions
This is the only right option, all those who needed every BoE item are selfish, and Ninja. "A value of BoE item is the same for everyone no matter if you're gonna use it or sell it." - this phrase from Oakenlix is one of the most ridiculous thoughts that I heard after returning to Vanilla. I also hope that as little as possible met people with similar beliefs.
