Garun

Are you horde or ally? If you are ally, then it's more about the stats and weapon dps, if you are horde then slower is better in general due to WF totem. Agreed

Pretty much this.

I don't know about you but I seem to see a lot of racists in world chat compared to old nost when I log in around 4 am server. Does anyone else notice this?

Those guys are good though. I used colored text in trade chat to make fun of the gold sellers there once and got caught.

I would understand if they were doing that at 60 for healer gear as most of the time druids are resto in raids, but even then they should let their group know they are rolling on healing gear.

If you are having to ask that question, then I wouldn't do it. Even the TF bindings aren't worth risking the permaban hammer.

Good luck getting TF if you aren't a core tank tbh. To answer your question OP, there isn't that much for Fury warriors aside from some of the weapons off of bosses as far as I know. However, I'm a tank and not a dps warrior so I don't know for sure.

Can you mention any major differences in the gear on here on the Elysium server versus Anathema server? Aside from the T1 gear being dogshit on Elysium for tanks, there are only minor differences for the most part like a few more +def on many items, but there are examples like the Naglering which is trash on Elysium but is solid on Anathema (or if it doesn't have the good tank stats there yet it will soon).

Just because you can get a better one in Maraudon doesn't mean that a mage rolling need on a 1h weapon CLEARLY for melee.

Unless you are talking about specific ones, that is complete bullshit.

Is anyone else getting the invite expired thing on the discord?

I've seen guys using real slurs like the n-word and the c-word in spam messages. I'm sick of the libtards PC crap, but those guys were really spamming racist messages like black people are a previous step in evolution with 99% of our dna vs a monkey's 98% and a guy telling people to tell the xiaos "get off of my server c-word." Though the xiaos guy falls more under prejudice against people of other nationalities, he used a racial slur in his message which amounts to the same thing as racism. The black guys one was using false information to promote his belief "that a particular race is superior to another."

Thank you for the answer.

So taking your BiS when others only want it for gold is ninja looting but rolling need on something that you can't use but can sell is not makes a lot of sense. It would be ninja looting if they did it for something they couldn't use though. What part of need before greed do you not understand? Everyone wants a few hundred gold, but not everyone needs the BoE.

It is NOT the same value to everyone in that case. It takes a mage like maybe 15 hours to farm 400g with AoE farming while those shoulders are BiS until Chromag in BwL.

At least those guys won't get into a decent guild, but the others will have a chance to be able to.

People like him and Beerwizard are one of the main reasons I don't pug as a tank. Why would I tank for someone that isn't in my guild, and might steal gear so they can get some gold. Beer can farm that gold easily while a tank can't. The next time you can't get a tank for a dungeon to gear up, you can thank the BoE needers.

You can also get that gold from farming, so "don't be a greedy asshole."

BoE needers cause people to be less likely to pug due to the chance of losing a BiS BoE epic taken from you by some greedy little piece of crap. It might not be technically ninja looting, but it goes against the common belief of need before greed. The core concept behind items is that they are equipped, not to exchange for god. The reason world drop epics are BoE is because any of them can drop even during solo play, so if you get one not for your class when questing/farming, you can trade it to someone that could actually use it. People buy those BoEs because it's worth more to then than the gold cost or they wouldn't buy it. Should MC pugs have the BoE tier pieces on open roll for all 40 people instead of the appropriate classes?

That is a good question that I would like to know the answer to as well.

Stances work the same for all specs as there aren't any talents to improve the other in any of the trees. Defensive Stance: 10% reduced damage taken, 10% reduced damage dealt, 130% base threat multiplier (150% with 5/5 defiance) Battle Stance: 80% base threat multiplier Berserker Stance: 10% increased damage taken, 3% more crit, 80% base threat multiplier Also don't forget many abilities have stance restrictions.

For the twelfth time, people that roll need on BoEs aren't ninjas, just assholes since not having to buy that will effectively give you the same gold as selling it.

That misconception is there because it's not always a reliable way of pushing crits off the attack table as bosses can attack more than twice every 5 seconds, which means the boss will hit you at least some when shield block isn't up. I've only tanked half of MC and Ony as MT on nost so I don't know what bosses if any have an attack speed that fast. Garr had an attack speed quite a bit faster than 2.5, but the adds would blow up even when banished after Garr got low enough, so my guild would kill the adds first which caused his attack speed to go way up to something like 1.2-1.5. This made it required for me to get defense cap to not get crit and even then, it was impossible to avoid all the crushing blows from that boss. Based on the guides I read on BwL, there are 3 bosses you will want def cap for, which are Broodlord, Chromaggus, and Nefarian. Broodlord's mortal strike hits for 8k on a crit (not sure if shield block can stop that crit, but I'm not taking that risk when I get there), Chormaggus stuns for a few seconds or so where you can't use shield block and your avoidance aside from miss chance won't do anything when stunned, and Nefarian's Warrior class call forces all warriors into berserker stance, where you can't use shield block. In short, until BwL you don't need to worry about defense cap assuming Garr's adds don't have that bug.

That's not exactly an option as it's not even possible to get that much avoidance if you wanted to.

I think it's intentional. However, you shouldn't ever run into this problem in raids as raids will ideally never have more than one shadow priest.