Jump to content

Ickus

Player
  • Content count

    682
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ickus

  1. Ickus

    Saving Vanilla after TBC.

    1x vanilla realms don't survive past naxx being farmed out. But honestly think the plan you outlined is great.
  2. We aren't making demands? We're saying we'd like to wait on Elysium to be ready for tbc. In addition the dev team has said Anathema is the only server going tbc at the moment. All the anathema players are asking for is that they don't do two separate timelines. How are we ruining Elysium a gaming experience by wanting them to be included in tbc? Would you rather anathema players saying "yay screw Elysium keep it vanilla!".
  3. If they open individual servers Anathema TBC will be a ghost town if they aren't on the same patch, which is why people on Anathema would like a compromise. You simply cannot do two separate timelines. But I do agree insults need to stop. I'd personally like to reunite the two servers.
  4. For the love of god say something of substance. You're trying to troll clearly but are so bad at it
  5. Yea but it's 2017 and everyone wants to be a special snowflake even if they suck.
  6. Oh man. You're a real wordsmith with those insults.
  7. Everything you post is pointless. Add another to the stack. We aren't crying but we're just saying a fact that Elysium wants it all their way.
  8. I just find it funny the anathema players are willing to wait a significant amount of time but the MC heroes have to do everything on their terms which is pathetic imo
  9. What is this mentality that everyone has to start evenly despite some people working harder than others? I farm my ass off and if I get 6k gold before tbc I should be allowed to use it for my epic mount.
  10. Worst idea out here yet, but best troll yet
  11. It's just very hard to honestly make any plans since there are basically no details. Best move would be to use the timeline @sumeht proposed which starts the timer for the next instance release based on when the final boss was killed. For instance Nef was killed 58 days before he war effort was released. It speeds up Elysium slightly and sends us to tbc in a reasonable time. Simply put there really isn't a great comprise here... just what is going to workout the best. And you shouldn't be going into every single raid tier will full BiS which is basically the norm on private servers due to bosses being cleared day 1.
  12. Dude if we don't wait for Elysium you're asking for the same disaster that happened to anathema. It's painful and will suck for a lot of us but in the long run going to tbc at the same time is honestly the best long term fix.
  13. Ickus

    Character Transfers

    We just need to wait and see. I personally would like to see the timer start as soon as the final boss is killed speeding it up by 3-4 months. Could also allow anathema players only to alpha and beta test but I do want to go to tbc same time as Elysium. It sucks but it's the best solution.
  14. Ickus

    Character Transfers

    It won't be 2019 id imagine but if we want it to work we need to wait on Elysium. If for nothing else than to avoid what we're dealing with on anathema right now
  15. Ickus

    Character Transfers

    They 100% need to wait on Elysium to catch up l. I'd be happy with farming naxx until Elysium is ready to transfer.
  16. Ickus

    Character Transfers

    They were pretty vague on what is happening. And nothing is set yet.
  17. Don't worry. We will wildly speculate until things are finalized.
  18. That's not what you said... you're advocating for different timelines. Have 20 servers... just have them on the same timeline so you can merge them like ZK and Ely
  19. By doing the attunement, which doesn't require heroics... heroic gear will replace some Naxx gear so you have to get rep and do them regardless. T3 is replaced by any epic in tbc... it doesn't give that huge of a boost, but is helpful.
  20. I think one thing discovered in this thread is no one wants separate timelines. Happy the vast majority agrees on that.
×