Oakenlix

That's because you misunderstood his sentence. He's talking about possible mistakes on GMs part, not the banned player.

I feel like hunter is a strong class in general, but it has some hard counters among other classes (paladins, shadow priests for example), so hunter really shines in group fights where he can pull the trigger without being targeted too much. But my pvp experience with hunter is quite limited, so I might be wrong.

"Also some other guy killed me in STV yesterday while I was questing, just because my pet attacked him, but pet is a pet, why kill me! I don't remember his name but please avoid him in groups at all costs, he is probably a ninja too!"

Weird, for me my low lvl pet gained exp no matter what was lvl of mobs I killed, and the exp he gained didn't vary very much.

Why ban him? How would that change anything?

Thats a great work. I have a question, does it show the data of all characters or only those that were online at that particular time? Would be interesting to see the proportions of classes among the players who are online.

An outrageously incompetent one. You ninja license is taken away until you graduate from your local ninja school again.

If you are high level and need copper and tin - just go to Deadmines, it even drops from mobs there in huge quantities (I said tities, haha).

So if a black guy calls someone an N-word, he is being racist towards himself?

The way you use the value you got from the item is irrelevant, I only make this example with gear because some people here are so fixated on it. So no, it's still the same principle. Rogue may spend his earned gold on anything he wants including giving it away for charity, same as mage could use his gear upgrade on farming boars in Durotar. Doesn't make any difference in how the loot is distributed. Such as?..

Yes, except if your friend owes you a couple of bucks, because then things become complicated.

But it was never my main point to tell people how to roll in their groups. My main point is that its extremely wrong to label people who roll "Need" on BoEs as ninjas and greedy cunts if there were no specific loot rules set, as they didn't do anything wrong. This is what I have a problem with. And then, just as a possible solution, I say that it would be better if everyone rolled like that, as it would remove the problem, but I'm ok if people don't want that. @Zabba I'm pretty sure you don't understand my perspective now that I've read your post, and you haven't proven my points to be wrong either. May be reading my posts for the second time would give you a better insight. As I said, I have nothing more to add to my arguments, and neither should it be nesessary.

If KGB finds out I was subscribed to a gay youtuber, there could be problems. I have already said too much, comrade. Take care.

But why do you think its even relevant? Everyone can farm, including the person whose upgrade dropped. This drop makes this farm unnesessary for him just like it does for me, so whats the difference? You insist that there's some magical meaning to whose class item dropped - like if it's a mage staff, then it should go to a mage even if any other member of the group can use it to get an appropriate gear upgrade for himself. Sorry, it doesn't make sense to me. Look, if a mage staff with market value of 100 gold drops, for mage winning this drop would save him these 100 gold that he no longer has to pay, and for any other group member it gives them 100 gold by selling it (to buy a gear or whatever else). It's the same 100 gold anyway, no matter how you look at this. And as I said earlier, while making no major difference in the way players are rewarded in groups, everyone rolling need on BoEs would remove the problem of so-called "ninjas", since there would be no room for it, isn't that a huge advantage? Well, if that doesn't convince you, I don't know what to say then. Agree to disagree, but I'm still confused why so many people don't realize it.

I think nothing tops the frost mage AoE farm.

I feel like sometimes the point amount is bugged, so you might wanna reset his skills at a pet trainer, it only costs 10 silver.

I recently did that, and found out the neutral AH cut is a huge 15%, so it might not be worth it.

No you said that you need gear, but you don't need gold as much because its a "luxury". I'm asking you, what if this gold allows me to buy a gear I need? Why should that be a lower priority than someone else's gear upgrade? And yes, a BoE drop is exactly the same as a bag of gold drop, except that you have to convert it to gold via AH. In which case, if you so desire, you could then split it between group members. @Roax Hey, nice post. One thing Id like to say is that we are indeed arguing about the facts rather than opinions. Everyone should roll need on any BoE - that's my opinion. Everyone benefits equally from winning a BoE - that's a fact, and I'm trying to explain why that is.

Thats a contradiction right there. You are saying player A needs a gear upgrade more than player B need the gold equivalent of the same gear upgrade.

Yep, thanks for adressing the "stealing" bullshit.

Please just tell me, why is mage's gear upgrade is more important than rogue's?

My answer is yes, everyone should need on any BoE. But its not about morality, it is just a more safe and simple system of loot distribution. In a way that you are describing, you can get fucked over by someone rolling need on an item that you were expecting him to greed. And it does happen, just look at all the "ninja" threads. Now what if everyone rolled need on every BoE? It would fix this problem. The average amount of value people get wouldn't change, as every valuable BoE is easily convertable, but now people wouldn't be afraid of scamming since there would be no room for one. As for you example, you are assuming that mage's gear upgrade is somehow more important that rogue's (which he would get from selling it and buying a suitable item for himself). I see completely no reason for that.

Because what you said is wrong.

3k population is not "dead", and Elysium realm sure doesn't need more players.

The fuck are you talking about?