nooobieee

I know the general policy is to not grant a request to switch quest rewards. But I read this comment from 2006... This applies to me as well, since Blizzard allowed it, would the team consider changing the policy to reflect this common issue with Druids? In my case I would like to switch to Mark of Tyranny now that I have more capability to tank instances, something I didn't even consider possible at the time I did this quest. http://thedruidsgrove.org/archive/wow/t-11227.html

I wanted to post this comment from Taladril, one of the most respected Druids on the server. I still believe that Druids are uniquely locked out of being the best they can because of this policy and think it should be carefully reconsidered. Now that Naxx is out, the game has changed. For a druid to be effective there they really need to have the best tools available.

This would be what I think is a great hybrid spec for healing and tanking. http://db.vanillagaming.org/?talent#0Zxxxs0RdZVxsofq

I guess that settles it then. As we've said all along this sort of cross faction collaboration should be disallowed, and now it is. Well done.

If you aggro the boss, don't be surprised when you get one-shot.

Regardless of the rationale of the poster from 2006, I inferred from this sentence that GMs were authorized to make such a change for a very limited number of times for each account or character. I understand, but to be clear, this was not a mistake. The only path to end game content for virtually all druids is healing. Only now am I able to gather and become (some may say marginally) viable as an off-tank. Now that I have enough healing gear, I can start to alter my spec to include tanking talents, something I couldn't viably do before now. The mistake, I feel, is locking virtually all druids from what is a BiS tanking item. A mistake that GMs in retail recognized and handled during vanilla retail. Addtionally, with all due respect, talents and spells have not been at the 1.12 functionality since the release of the server. For example, changes/fixes to spell co-efficients have been made as well as the release of new ranks with the new content. Of course, I respect the right of the team to set any policy they deem appropriate. Thank you for your time.

What effects do Priests and Shamans have on armor? I don't play either of those classes.

That's what it's worth to the person paying at the moment they pay. Your mileage may vary.

A BG popped.

Then what was your point in posting meters?

doesn't always work. But good advice because sometimes it does.

So you're now fighting a mob starting with half their health. Perhaps you should consider that mission accomplished?

That is just amazingly awesome given the posts you've been making over and over. You've never even experienced "blizzlike".

I said no such thing. I said that any idea to change the server is a valid idea to be implemented or not depending on what the server team decides. Your argument of "not blizzlike" is arbitrarily applied by you to ideas you just don't like. One can assume because you don't have a better argument to make.

You're ridiculous. You say I'm wrong and then counter with exactly what I said. "within reason" is a subjective opinion. Opinions vary, and as we all know, everyone has one.

"blizz like" is not "blizz clone". The server is not a "blizz clone", how far from clone the server gets is up to the owners of the server. Your notion that not "blizz like" is some valid argument against any idea is specious. It's not "blizz like" to have a server with over a hundred guilds that have cleared BWL and no expansion coming. It's not "blizz like" to have a much larger population on one server. It's not "blizz like" to have 3 servers total... the list goes on and on.

enslave works horribly, at least in instances. The demon is very likely to freeze in place and not respond. At that point you're stuck with a demon you can't use or get rid of. It may or may not randomly unfreeze at some point...

Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra.

I don't think it reflects vanilla. I don't recall fear pushing a mob so far away that you lose the targeting (for example). There still seems to be favored pathing.

Hi, while you're looking at warlocks... the felhunter doesn't attack aggroed stealthed targets. It takes away almost all the value of what is perhaps the most important PvP ability of the felhunter.

I get an error trying to add a bug, so I'll put it here. With the Felhunter on aggressive it should attack any stealthed targets detected, but instead it just freezes and doesn't move. Once in this state you can't even get it to move by switching to passive.

What is self explanatory is that you can't select need if the item is BoP but you can't use it. But you can on any BoE item.

That isn't implied at all. What is implied by the implemented system is that if you can click the button... then you can click the button. If some unspoken rules were to be had, then there would be no reason to disable the button on BoP items you can't equip but leave it enabled for BoE items.

Well, good luck with that. I don't expect folks to engage with you productively if you insist they accept some flawed premise from the get go and call them a troll when they don't. Have fun arguing with yourself then.

I've agreed with you on other posts, since I don't on this one suddenly I'm a troll? That's not a very consistent or helpful philosophy.