Jump to content

Lunaa

Player
  • Content count

    13
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Lunaa

  • Rank
    Lurker

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. https://github.com/elysium-project/server/issues/2582 Read through the issue on the link. "Bugged behavior: Thunderfury in Anathema is bugged and has a low proc chance of 5-10% or has a ppm. Correct behavior: Thunderfury should have a proc chance of 20% and Thunderfury proc is NOT a ppm and has no limits per minute. Source: Thunderfury in retail from 2005 to now still has 20% proc chance and has no ppm. All legitimate sources including wowwiki, wowhead, blizzard forum, vanilla retail 2006 videos, any year 05-17 retail videos of thunderfury, any thunderfury related posts from 2005 to now 2017 provides only 20% proc rate and no ppm. The thunderfury sword has remained unchanged in proc chance even today in retail. Still 20% and all real legit sources provides only 20%. In reply to a fallacy claim of 15% proc chance from @ohganot : @ohganot No it was never at 15% in any point in vanilla or any expansion. That 15% figure has already been disproven because it is literally non existent throughout vanilla wow and there is no real source that says so. No where around the sources does 15% exist. Preferences or opinions are not prioritized in a blizzlike server. You can't argue "overpower" because that is again an opinion and preference. Your only source for 15% is because it's "overpowered", that is a total fallacy because it clearly comes from your preference. This game is not about your preference, vanilla wow is about vanilla wow. The game does not revolve around you. There is an overpowering factor for every class and items in vanilla and it's like you're saying you hate it so you want it nerfed, again a complete fallacy. In conclusion again all real sources provide 20% from 2005 and even today, TF proc rate has remained unchanged. You can go to any retail source on TF from 2005 to 2017 and it is simply 20%. 20% you cannot deny. 15% is a fallacy so you can't enforce that at all. 15% will always be marked as a bug, anything less than 20% is a bug and that's just facts. Lastly for the staffs reading this, please let us know here in the comments if @ohganot is the one who's been enforcing 15% or less in proc rate because this has been a problem for some time now and it seems that @ohganot is involved in making the proc chance lower than blizzlike 20%. If you are a staff please investigate the item scripter and the one enforcing this bug."
  2. https://github.com/elysium-project/server/issues/2456 Click the link to learn more about the issue. this has been reported multiple times before here on Anathema. All real sources from 2005-2017 wowwiki, blizzard retail forum, wowhead and any other website supports the value of 20% proc rate and has not been changed from 2005 until now.
  3. Now Elysium is reaching 10k and beyond but it can only handle 8k. The server cannot grow further if it cannot increase the capacity and it cannot maintain quality if it is always at the peak. Queue is taking over 30 minutes too which is too much. We know more services came out in 2007 which is in the burning crusade expansion such as character name change. There was only server transfer back in classic but server transfer won't be applicable on Elysium due to the differences of timelines. I think it will be necessary to release some form of services because in blizzard, they have monthly subscription paying for the servers. Name change service could cost 10 usd and it is estimated to generate minimum of 1000 usd per month on a server with 10k active online.
  4. Thunderfury was pending to be fixed to 20% proc rate which is the blizzard retail value on all sources from 2005-6 and even today it still has 20% in retail and has never been changed or altered. Currently the proc rate is abusively set to 5% and all TF users can confirm this currently. Only the staff that fixes bugs can do such an abusive setting on it. It doesn't faze me, it amuses me that you have a special staff monkey abusing the item thunderfury. If you have a staff monkey doing this on a particular item, what more is he doing with other things secretly in this server? To all the elysium staff and players, you're focking crazy if you think this scripter monkey is doing his job properly.
  5. Thunderfury was pending to be fixed to 20% proc rate which is the blizzard retail value on all sources from 2005-6 and even today it still has 20% in retail and has never been changed or altered. Currently the proc rate is abusively set to 5% and all TF users can confirm this currently. Only the staff that fixes bugs can do such an abusive setting on it. It doesn't faze me, it amuses me that you have a special staff monkey abusing the item thunderfury. If you have a staff monkey doing this on a particular item, what more is he doing with other things secretly in this server? To all the elysium staff and players, you're focking crazy if you think this scripter monkey is doing his job properly.
  6. here on elysium pvp gear should also be updated at 1.6 too like in the Nostalrius timeline because BWL loots are already on the same level or nefarian loots which is even stronger than the updated Rank gear. The current r13 rank gear are only the same levl as T1. The R10 gear is weaker than prebis blues. The current r14 weapons are also on the same level as ragnaros loot for example: r14 2hander and boneweaver 2hander. Infact the current R14 range weapon is even weaker than blue range weapons. Even if the r14 xbow is updated, chrommagus xbow is still much stronger. The updated r14 xbow is only on the same level as rok delar, updated r14 xbow is even weaker than rok delar. So not updating pvp gear would make them obsolete as you know. So I think the update should come as nostalrius has done. AQ40 items are much stronger than R14 or R13 set. Example: rogue t2.5, c'thun 2hander or dagger. Qiraji ripper is also much stronger than r14 sword. So I support the Nostalrius timeline to update the pvp gear. Updated r14 would be useless on AQ patch as AQ weapons are much stronger than the updated pvp gear. And BWL gears are already on the same level as updated epic pvp gear. Epic rank gear should at least match the best raid gear because epic rank gear requires 20x more hours over into obtaining. So again I support the nostalrius timeline update which is 1.6 Updating the rank gear would allow it to match BWL gear. Not updating to AQ would make rank gear obsolete. Because when AQ comes out, AQ gear are much stronger already. Currently Rank gear only matches T1 gear. The only addition to AQ40 would be the r14 spellcaster and healing weapons
  7. here on elysium pvp gear should also be updated at 1.6 too like in the Nostalrius timeline because BWL loots are already on the same level or nefarian loots which is even stronger than the updated Rank gear. The current r13 rank gear are only the same levl as T1. The R10 gear is weaker than prebis blues. The current r14 weapons are also on the same level as ragnaros loot for example: r14 2hander and boneweaver 2hander. Infact the current R14 range weapon is even weaker than blue range weapons. Even if the r14 xbow is updated, chrommagus xbow is still much stronger. The updated r14 xbow is only on the same level as rok delar, updated r14 xbow is even weaker than rok delar. So not updating pvp gear would make them obsolete as you know. So I think the update should come as nostalrius has done. AQ40 items are much stronger than R14 or R13 set. Example: rogue t2.5, c'thun 2hander or dagger. Qiraji ripper is also much stronger than r14 sword. So I support the Nostalrius timeline to update the pvp gear. Updated r14 would be useless on AQ patch as AQ weapons are much stronger than the updated pvp gear. And BWL gears are already on the same level as updated epic pvp gear. Epic rank gear should at least match the best raid gear because epic rank gear requires 20x more hours over into obtaining. So again I support the nostalrius timeline update which is 1.6 Updating the rank gear would allow it to match BWL gear. Not updating to AQ would make rank gear obsolete. Because when AQ comes out, AQ gear are much stronger already. Currently Rank gear only matches T1 gear. The only addition to AQ40 would be the r14 spellcaster and healing weapons
  8. Hello I just tested both sides at lvl 60 anathema pvp server Horde (orc) And Alliance (elf) The proc rate on the orc warrior was about 5-6% Weapon speed 3.40 The proc rate on the elf warrior is about 1-2% Weapon speed 3.50 The elf warrior generated 3x less extra attacks than the orc warrior Tested for 1000 swings each in pve Orc warrior sword proc'd 69x Elf warrior sword proc'd 20x Also tested in pvp and alliance warriors have 3-4x less sword proc rate than horde warriors. The results are consistent in any event. There's definitely a seen and experienced big difference if you have sword warriors on both sides. Hand of justice or WF were not used at any point. Anyway if anyone is willing to do tests with data on this problem, that would help to get it fixed.
  9. Lunaa

    delete

    Some people are offended, some do not reply too. The religious people are not "butthurt" but realized any offensive name can be butthurt
  10. Lunaa

    delete

    I did not differentiate them and there is such a thing as Christians and Catholics.
  11. Lunaa

    delete

    well there are jews, christians and catholics playing and it is offensive to some.
×