Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Baekk_x

need to transfer characters or not.

to transfer characters from the worlds.  

61 members have voted

  1. 1. to be or not to be!!!

    • Valkyrie (RU) -----> Nostalrius(EU)
    • Elysium (EU) ------> Nostalrius(EU)
    • Valkyrie (RU) + Elysium (EU) -------> Nostalrius(EU)
    • "fresh" start


Recommended Posts

The current plan is perfect? Valkyrie -> Nostalrius won't happen for obvious reasons. Also fresh start should be a part of the Elysium -> Nostalrius option, since that's what we get.

Edited by Guessilldps

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The current plan is perfect? Valkyrie -> Nostalrius won't happen for obvious reasons. Also fresh start should be a part of the Elysium -> Nostalrius option, since that's what we get.

What is the obvious reason please ?

We want our characters in which we invest more then 100days of playtime , whats wrong with that,those chars are bwl geared, same as nost characters.

Edited by earth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's possible I think it'd be sweet to have the Valk characters merged as well. They've been at BWL, so the same place as Nost, and those characters may date back as far as Scriptcraft 2. I would love having my toon from back then on a server where it's worth playing.

Edited by Duranasaur

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mb russian devs/admins/team has no vote on this, maybe they are controlled by NOSTALRIUS atm. Thats why they are scared to do anything which poor nost team  wouldnt like. GG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What would compel you to think that your server, which has been out for 5+ years, will be merged in with Nostalrius? Your economy is insanely bad I'm sure and your characters have items that shouldn't be obtainable on Nostalrius. Your server is full of rank 14 characters that probably ranked with less than 100 people playing on the server.

 

Why would they merge your dead server into a competitive, new, live economic server?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No fun server. Vanilla wow. Same expansion. Everything obtainable same as on nost. Blizzlike.

Why would nost be joining elysium ? Elysium is new server, nost was out way longer and has things that shouldnt be obtainable on elysium . HA!

Edited by Pottu
Removed broken quote

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not possible to rank up on valkyrie with such low pop, all which we did there happened when the server was in it's prime, long time ago. Please don't form negative opinion when you didnt see 3 day fights for one world boss. Or constant 40 vs 40 man fighting in BRM cause guilds spied on each other. Valk was once alive and prosperous :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What would compel you to think that your server, which has been out for 5+ years, will be merged in with Nostalrius? Your economy is insanely bad I'm sure and your characters have items that shouldn't be obtainable on Nostalrius. Your server is full of rank 14 characters that probably ranked with less than 100 people playing on the server.

 

Why would they merge your dead server into a competitive, new, live economic server?

Your argument is invalid as the ranking system is all relative. Meaning the less people on the server...the less people who can rank. I would know. I had to hold standing 1 for a whole month straight to get rank 14. Standing 2 wouldn't cut it. Economy was fine. The server just started dying as every russian betrayed the server and went immediately to the new servers when they opened. There are no items that characters have here that aren't obtainable on Nostalrius. You obviously have no idea what you are talking about. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Btw, Vitaliy confirmed that no transfer from valk, And yes there was items from aq20 and aq quest chain, along with aq spell books and enchants.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

×