Amanwithaproblem 0 Report post Posted August 10, 2017 Here is what I will do Shiamorah, I will take down the post. And reformat it, No names in the title. However I wont beable to hide the GM's name in game, and we will let the playerbase decide for themselves who's in the wrong? I will simply inform everyone of what the new changes to the game entail: being that you must PvP in a PvP location or you are subject to being banned. Does this seem fair? 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shiamorah 20 Report post Posted August 10, 2017 5 minutes ago, Amanwithaproblem said: Here is what I will do Shiamorah, I will take down the post. And reformat it, No names in the title. However I wont beable to hide the GM's name in game, and we will let the playerbase decide for themselves who's in the wrong? I will simply inform everyone of what the new changes to the game entail: being that you must PvP in a PvP location or you are subject to being banned. Does this seem fair? I have a much easier suggestion bud, use proper channels :) I can easily see you attempting to sway a situation that could easily be taken out of context, especially considering that the screenshots you posted are clearly not the entire conversation, and there is no statement from the opposite side. This is why people call it a "witch hunt". It is a biased argument targeted at a single person, used to incite fear by using large statements like "staff ban players for PvP". You are right that this is not a player report, or a ban appeal, but just like posting a ban appeal in general, it will not even be acknowledged until you post it in the right forum, ban appeals in this instance. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amanwithaproblem 0 Report post Posted August 10, 2017 Tried that, didn't work. I Have reformatted the post accordingly as to not make it seem a witch-hunt. Will no longer be replying on the matter as I have stated my case in it's entirety for everyone to view. As this issue undeniably effects every player in the game. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shiamorah 20 Report post Posted August 10, 2017 1 minute ago, Amanwithaproblem said: Tried that, didn't work. I Have reformatted the post accordingly as to not make it seem a witch-hunt. Will no longer be replying on the matter as I have stated my case in it's entirety for everyone to view. As this issue undeniably effects every player in the game. Sorry, this is no different than posting a ban appeal in general. Wrong forum :( Please post it in the Administration Complaints forum. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stodola 26 Report post Posted August 10, 2017 This has nothing to do with two players coincidentally encountering each other and choosing to give each other a wide birth - it's collusion over farming and access to resources. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Akuta 5 Report post Posted August 10, 2017 Greetings All, **Edit to make it clear** Cross faction collusion when taken to the extreme is against the ToU, a couple of people standing around a zone farming a resource for the most part shouldn't be called collusion. The GM team will step in when things are taken to far, but in this case we probably shouldn't have stepped in. I'll make sure he gets a refresher training session. We apologize for the inconvenience this has caused. If you would like to discuss this further your welcome to Direct message me. Akuta. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
